Materiality, like risk, is dynamic.
While our regular risk assessment includes external views to ensure risk completeness, materiality focuses on stakeholder priorities providing a deeper understanding of reputational, environmental and societal impact.
It is a reflection of what our stakeholders care about and where we can deliver the most impact. In 2024/2025, we refreshed our materiality process using several lenses:
1. Strategic Relevance – Does this issue directly influence our ability to protect or create value?
2. Stakeholder Impact – Does it significantly influence how our stakeholders assess Link?
We also added a third lens: Controllability. If an issue is strategic and material, but beyond our influence, we monitor it. But we focus resources on areas where our action can deliver results.
For example, carbon pricing policy is strategic and material but not within our control. In contrast, waste management and building resilience are both material and directly actionable.
Materiality confirms what is important. Our Enterprise Risk Management ensures we act on it with consistency and speed.
List of Material Issues
Ref | Material Issue | Materiality Rating |
M1 | Operational Excellence | Extremely Material |
M2 | Stable return, Sustainable Growth & Business Model Resilience | |
M3 | Corporate Governance & Business Ethics | |
M4 | Climate Risk Resilience | |
M5 | Decarbonisation & Energy Efficiency | |
M6 | Effective Risk Management | Highly Material |
M7 | Meeting Investor, Tenant and Other Stakeholder Expectations | |
M8 | Occupational Health and Safety | |
M9 | Transparent Communication & Brand Reputation | |
M10 | Talent Development and Retention | |
M11 | Responsible Investment | |
M12 | Resource Management | |
M13 | Supply Chain Management | |
M14 | Green Building Certification | |
M15 | Technology, Innovation & Cybersecurity | |
M16 | Employee Well-being, DEI & Corporate Culture | Moderately Material |
M17 | Community Investment and Development | |
M18 | Sustainable Finance |